I saw a suggestion on the Internet somewhere that "Viking" should really be retired as a general term for that era/people /civilization as it conjures up that image of hairy bloodthirsty raiders which isn't really helpful. What's the opinion of modern historiography on this?
by /u/Brickie78 in /r/AskHistorians
Upvotes: 40
Favorite this post:
Mark as read:
Your rating:
Add this post to a custom list