Talleyrand seems to be universally considered a corrupt figure by his contemporaneous. He was also continuous employed by the most different and diverse regimes over various decades. Why was he considered so important and useful? And how did he manage to be always at the top with so much distrust?
by /u/[deleted] in /r/AskHistorians
Upvotes: 7
Favorite this post:
Mark as read:
Your rating:
Add this post to a custom list