/r/askhistorians
Today historians seem to reject the idea of the "tree of civilization" and the notion of "progress." Have historians developed an alternative model for what we see, or does history truly have no direction?
Mark as read: Add to a list
How many US Presidents could be considered alcoholics? And did their alcoholism at any time have a marked impact on US affairs?
Mark as read: Add to a list
If modern humans have existed for 200,000 years, and the oldest known civilisations were around 6000 years old, then what stopped us progressing for 194,000 years?
Mark as read: Add to a list
In The Shining by Stanley Kubrick the dialogue, and perhaps in most movies of that era, was very succinct and almost unnaturally abrupt from one character to the other. Is there a reason why this and other movies of the time portrayed regular speech in such an unnatural rhythm?
Mark as read: Add to a list
Mark as read: Add to a list
How did wealthy people in the Middle Ages or antiquity move their wealth around when they moved from region to region?
Mark as read: Add to a list
The Hatian Revolution saddled Hati with 90M Francs of debt to France, which took until 1947 to pay off. Why would Hati continue to pay this debt? Couldn’t they have declared it illegitimate after the overthrow of the monarchy? Or the empire? Or the republic?
Mark as read: Add to a list
The Romans famously left their conquered subjects to rule themselves so long as they paid their taxes. Were these local rulers as corrupt as we'd assume they'd be? Were the Romans letting their subjects get double fleeced (flayed?)?
Mark as read: Add to a list
I recently learned that Sweden was due to invade Norway to oppose its independence but stopped after Swedish soldiers threatened a mutiny and Swedish unions threatened a general strike. Why was there so much popular support for Norwegian independence?
Mark as read: Add to a list