/u/NORCAL_50's posts

Year:

Only show posts with narrations

Why not dimension this .247±.001 or .248+0/-.002? This is standard practice for fits, but I don't know the reason behind it

373 upvotes • r/Machinists

Mark as read: Add to a list

Why not dimension this .247±.001 or .248+0/-.002? This is standard practice for fits, but I don't know the reason behind it.

168 upvotes • r/MechanicalEngineering

Mark as read: Add to a list

Why not dimension this .246±.002? Or .248+0/-.004? For fits, this is standard practice. Why?

1 upvotes • r/MechanicalEngineering

Mark as read: Add to a list

Title	Upvotes	Subreddit	Mark as read	Favorited	Rating	Add to a list
Why not dimension this .247±.001 or .248+0/-.002? This is standard practice for fits, but I don't know the reason behind it	373	Machinists
Why not dimension this .247±.001 or .248+0/-.002? This is standard practice for fits, but I don't know the reason behind it.	168	MechanicalEngineering
Why not dimension this .246±.002? Or .248+0/-.004? For fits, this is standard practice. Why?	1	MechanicalEngineering