/u/catcherguy94's posts
Serious question here. If all historians have to go on are historical texts and documents, how does history as a discipline move forward assuming that very few relevant new texts are discovered each year? How is progress distinguished from pure speculation?
Mark as read: Add to a list
If no birth certificate were recorded at someone's birth, and they didn't have a good idea of how old they were, would there be any kind of test that could reliably give them an age?
Mark as read: Add to a list
Mark as read: Add to a list