/u/nil_clinton's posts in /r/askscience
subjects which (I hear) science has patchy support for/ understanding of (e.g. hypnotism, the placebo effect, acupuncture)
1 upvotes
Mark as read: Add to a list
Is it true that science has accepts subjects like hypnotism and the placebo effect as real, but has patchy support for and understanding of how/why they work?
1 upvotes
Mark as read: Add to a list
Is hyponisis a thing, beyond subjects 'playing along'? Is there a meaningful difference? Does science have any evidence about hypnotism's mechanism(s)?
1 upvotes
Mark as read: Add to a list
Is the tautology of the notion of 'survival of the fittest' (i.e. survival of the ones that survive) a problem for the Theory of Evolution, or a communication issue (or my misunderstanding)?
1 upvotes
Mark as read: Add to a list
If funding wasn't an issue, do we have the tech for a return mission to Mars? What about a permanent base?
1 upvotes
Mark as read: Add to a list